A group of 403(b) plan participants are suing their employer
for allegedly keeping imprudent investments as choices in the plan and for
causing them to pay excessive fees for plan investments, among other things.
According to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
(ERISA) lawsuit, “for the period beginning January 1, 2015, through the date
the plan was terminated, May 31, 2019, plan participants lost approximately
$4.6 million due to excessive fees and costs as a result of Columbus Regional’s
breaches of fiduciary duty.”
The lawsuit alleges that Columbus Regional Healthcare, which
was acquired by Atlanta-based Piedmont Healthcare in 2018, selected and
maintained actively managed funds in the 403(b) plan “in the hope of generating
‘excess returns.’” However, it says the health care system ignored the “red
flags” of high expense ratios which cost participants millions of dollars. The
plaintiffs say the actively managed funds underperformed and did not recoup
them for high fees. The lawsuit claims a prudent fiduciary would have
considered index funds as options for the plan.
The health care system is also charged with selecting
high-priced share classes and not negotiating as a “large plan” for
lower-priced share classes.
The lawsuit says Columbus Regional failed to prudently
select, evaluate and monitor the plan’s target-date fund (TDF) suite. It says
the family of TDFs managed by American Century did not have a consistent track
record of outperforming the market and that the returns did not justify their
costs. In addition, Columbus Regional is accused of selecting the most
expensive share classes for the TDFs—Class A—when it could have selected
cheaper R-6 share classes.
The lawsuit also calls out the stable value fund selected by
Columbus Regional, saying it generated lower returns than “substantially
identical” stable value funds offered by other investment managers.
Plaintiffs challenge the administrative expenses of the
plan, saying that revenue sharing hid the true cost of the plan. They say the
fees charged by the investment adviser to the plan were “grossly excessive” and
that the fees charged by the plan’s recordkeeper were 1.7 to 3.1 times what a
reasonable fee would have been.
Plaintiffs also say they were not provided with information
they needed to make informed investment decisions. They say Columbus Regional
did not disclose the excessive fees participants were paying and that it had
selected higher-cost share classes for investments in the plan. “The
disclosures Columbus Regional did provide to participants consisted of
incomplete and vague boilerplate [information] furnished by the very same
service providers that benefited from the excessive fees and kickbacks,” the
complaint states.
Columbus Regional’s parent company did not respond to a
request for comment.
Click here for the
original article.