Pension plans and other institutional investors are
embracing a federal proposal that would force hedge funds and private-equity
funds to provide more disclosures to investors.
University endowments, insurance funds and retirement funds
serving teachers and firefighters are urging the Securities and Exchange
Commission to move forward with a proposed rule that would ensure private-fund
investors receive annual audits and quarterly statements. The rule, which has
been heavily criticized by the private funds and Republicans, would also
prohibit fund managers from passing along certain legal costs and limit the
funds’ ability to insulate themselves from lawsuits.
Many pension plans are having a hard time meeting their
payout obligations to members, the result of decades of underfunding, benefit
overpromises and unrealistic demands from unions. This year’s simultaneous
decline in stocks and bonds has only made matters worse. To compensate, many
pension plans are increasingly putting their money into private-market
investments like hedge funds, private-equity funds and private-debt funds.
Private-fund managers control more than $18 trillion in
assets from pension plans, sovereign-wealth funds, endowments, insurers and
family offices. They pool investor money and lock it up for years at a time in
private-equity funds that buy and overhaul companies, private-debt funds that
make loans to companies or other similar investment vehicles. They operate with
far less government oversight than publicly traded companies or mutual funds.
Support from investor groups is key for the SEC initiative,
which has garnered forceful pushback from Republicans, private-equity firms and
hedge funds. These critics argue the proposed disclosure requirements are
unnecessary because institutional investors are large and sophisticated enough
to demand whatever information they need from private funds.
State and local retirement systems and other government
investment funds control more than $5 trillion in combined assets. But they say
that as capital has flooded into private markets in recent years, fierce
competition over in-demand managers leaves them at a growing disadvantage.
“A frequent refrain that the [New York State Common
Retirement Fund] receives in response to its request for improved fund terms
that would benefit all investors is: ‘respectfully declined,’” the fund’s chief
investment officer wrote in a comment letter to the SEC.
Private-fund managers say the proposed rules would lower
returns for the very investors rallying in support. A letter by the American
Investment Council, the private-equity industry’s main trade group, said the
“paternalistic” plan would “curb the entrepreneurialism, flexibility, and
investment returns that make private funds an increasingly attractive option.”
Pension funds, anxious to drum up enough cash to cover the
promises they made to investors, hope that the potentially higher returns offered
by hedge funds and private-equity firms will help close funding gaps and limit
how often they have to take the politically unpopular step of increasing
retirement contributions from state and local governments and their workers.
Pension plans’ private-equity holdings alone likely equate to about half a
trillion dollars, according to data from Preqin and the Federal Reserve.
At the Ohio Public Employees Retirement System, where
private equity represents 12.5% of total assets and has outperformed the
system’s broader portfolio, Executive Director Karen Carraher expressed support
for most aspects of the SEC proposal. She said it would reduce investors’ need
to painstakingly negotiate basic disclosures from private funds and help them
more easily spot self-interested behavior by private-fund managers.
The investment chief of one major U.S. pension plan told The
Wall Street Journal it takes his accounting staff approximately six months to
extract and standardize information from private-fund managers’ reports to compare
and track costs.
SEC Chairman Gary Gensler told reporters last month that the
proposal is about efficiency. “If I know you’re paying one thing for a cup of
coffee and I’m paying the same price, that transparency helps price formation
in capital markets,” he said. The Democratic-controlled commission approved the
proposal by a 3-to-1 vote in February, signaling a strong chance that a final
version will be adopted. The agency recently extended the comment period for
the proposal to June 13 amid pressure from some lawmakers and industry groups.
Pension funds make less money on their private-equity
investments than other types of institutional investors do. The average
annualized return for big public pension plans for the 20 years ended June 30,
2021, was 11.8%, according to an analysis of data from the Boston College
Center for Retirement Research on the five largest plans with July 1-June 30
fiscal years. Annualized returns for private-equity funds tracked by the
data-analytics firm Burgiss for the same period were 13.4%.
In a poll of 100 in-house attorneys representing
private-equity investors, 84% said they accept unsatisfying terms in at least
some funds they invest in, out of fear that pushing for better terms will cause
their institution to lose access to the fund manager or be allocated a smaller
share of the fund. More than one-third of the lawyers polled came from public
pension funds.
“This is what you’re hearing from investors: ‘We’re nervous
about losing our allocation so we don’t want to be the squeaky wheel,’” said
William Clayton, a professor at Brigham Young University’s law school who
conducted the poll at an October conference and made the data public in a
comment letter.
In addition to imposing disclosure requirements, the SEC
proposal would ban private-fund managers from charging investors for the costs
of regulatory exams, investigations or SEC settlements and fines. And it would
prohibit contracts between institutional investors and private-fund managers in
which investors agree not to sue for certain types of negligence and breaches
of fiduciary duty. Florida laws ban some such contracts.
Jeremiah Williams, who represents investment managers for
the law firm Ropes & Gray LLP, co-wrote a comment letter pushing back
against some of the prohibitions. He said immunity against low-level lawsuits
can help free up managers to take risks that result in higher returns.
“It doesn’t strike me as particularly unfair that people who
have had the strongest performance are the people who are able to negotiate
terms that are to their benefit,” Mr. Williams, who is also a former member of
the SEC division of enforcements’ asset-management unit, said in an interview.
Another provision in the SEC rule would target private-fund
managers using debt instead of investor cash as the initial funding source for
new ventures, a practice that can make returns look higher than they are. The
rule would compel managers to calculate returns over the longer period
beginning with the borrowing, not just the shorter period beginning with the
drawdown of investor capital.
Click here for the
original article.